- Immigrant Times
- 6 days ago
- 3 min read
Updated: 4 days ago
A Russian victory in Ukraine could trigger a new refugee crisis across Europe
“If Ukraine were to lose significant territory or political autonomy, millions more civilians could feel compelled to flee westward.”
By The Immigrant Times
Studies warn that a Russian victory in Ukraine or a peace deal favourable to the aggressor could result in millions of refugees. (Photo: Lucy Beck / CARE)
December 2025: European policymakers have grown accustomed to the idea that the war in Ukraine, though devastating, has produced a refugee crisis that is at least broadly understood and manageable. More than six million Ukrainians have already sought protection across Europe, and host countries, especially Germany, Poland, Czechia, and the Baltic states, have built extensive systems to support them.
But a series of recent studies, discussed in German outlets such as Frankfurter Rundschau, Tagesspiegel and Handelsblatt, suggests that Europe may be dangerously underestimating what could come next. According to several research institutions and security analysts, a Russian victory, whether outright or through a disadvantageous settlement forced on Kyiv, could trigger a humanitarian shock far larger than anything seen so far.
The studies, produced by European security think tanks and migration experts, outline a stark scenario. If Ukraine were to lose significant territory or political autonomy, millions more civilians could feel compelled to flee westward. Some projections estimate that six to eleven million additional Ukrainians might attempt to reach EU countries in the months following a Russian victory. Under more pessimistic assumptions, some analysts warn the number could be even higher. What makes these figures so alarming is not only their scale but also their speed. Unlike the steady outflow witnessed in 2022 and 2023, a post-victory exodus could occur in a compressed period, overwhelming reception systems from Warsaw to Berlin and beyond.
The logic behind these forecasts is grimly straightforward. A Russian victory would likely mean intensified repression in occupied territories, the dismantling of Ukrainian state structures, and widespread fear of political persecution, conscription, or forced integration into Russian administrative systems. Many Ukrainians who remained in contested regions during the early years of the war have done so under the assumption that the Ukrainian state would eventually reassert control.
If that hope were to vanish, migration experts argue, the dam could break. Entire families—often with young children and elderly relatives—would seek safety in the European Union, where existing Ukrainian communities and established protection mechanisms make onward flight both feasible and rational.
For Europe, the consequences would be transformative. Even under best-case planning assumptions, hosting millions more refugees would strain housing capacities, social systems, and public finances. Germany has already faced intense political debates over accommodation shortages and the limits of municipal support. A sudden influx on the scale projected by these studies would almost certainly deepen those pressures.
Local authorities warn that without rapid investments in housing, integration, and schooling, social cohesion risks eroding. Politically, the rise of far-right parties across several EU states adds another layer of vulnerability: migration-driven anxiety has frequently been leveraged to polarise electorates, and a multi-million-person wave could reshape national debates for years.
Economists quoted in the German press also highlight the financial implications. Supporting a new wave of refugees would require enormous public expenditures—potentially hundreds of billions of euros over several years. When combined with the defence spending increases Europe would demand of itself in the aftermath of a Russian victory, the cost of letting Ukraine lose may ultimately exceed the cost of sustained military assistance to Kyiv. In other words, the price of inaction could be higher than the price of support.
The studies also challenge a widespread European assumption: that Ukrainian displacement will remain temporary. While many Ukrainians still express a desire to return home, surveys over the past year show a growing share is uncertain about whether a return will ever be possible. A Russian victory would likely harden that shift, transforming what has been framed as an emergency into a long-lasting demographic reality. Policymakers who continue to treat Ukrainian refugees as temporary guests risk being unprepared for a future in which they become permanent residents.
Yet the authors of these analyses stress that this scenario is not inevitable. Much depends on the outcome of the war and the consistency of Western support. A stable or Ukrainian-favourable settlement could encourage many displaced people to return and reduce the likelihood of renewed flight. But if Russia prevails, the human consequences will not be confined to Ukraine’s borders. They will be felt across Europe. The most pessimistic projections envisage a scenario similar to the floods of refugees after World War II.
Further reading: Ireland needs and welcomes immigrants, but challenges mount || Britain’s new asylum proposals ||
BACK TO TOP
COMMENTS
FOLLOW